Case brief Library

📚 Case Brief Library

Welcome to the Case Brief Library — your trusted source for premium legal case briefs and study resources!
Organized by topic to help you find exactly what you need. 📖⚖️

🏛️ Landmark Cases

CaseSummaryLink
Marbury v. Madison (1803)Established the doctrine of judicial review in the U.S. Supreme Court.Read the Brief ➔
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)Struck down racial segregation in public schools, overturning Plessy v. Ferguson.Read the Brief ➔
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)Upheld "separate but equal" segregation laws until overturned by Brown v. Board.Read the Brief ➔
Sweatt v. Painter (1950)Challenged segregation in higher education, setting the stage for Brown.Read the Brief ➔

📜 Constitutional Law

CaseSummaryLink
Terry v. Ohio (1968)Established stop-and-frisk standards under the Fourth Amendment.Read the Brief ➔
Twice Tried: Double Jeopardy ExplainedAn overview of constitutional protections against being tried twice for the same offense.Read the Article ➔
Stare Decisis: The Backbone of Legal StabilityA study on the constitutional and practical role of precedent in law.Read the Article ➔

⚖️ Criminal Law

CaseSummaryLink
State v. NormanSelf-defense and battered spouse syndrome in criminal law.Read the Brief ➔
State v. HunterComplicity and levels of criminal involvement discussed.Read the Brief ➔
People v. StaplesSearch and seizure, constructive possession issues under Fourth Amendment principles.Read the Brief ➔

⚖️ Civil Rights Law

CaseSummaryLink
Sweatt v. Painter (1950)Civil rights challenge to racially separate law schools.Read the Brief ➔
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)Ending segregation in education.Read the Brief ➔

🧠 Legal Concepts and Doctrines

TopicSummaryLink
Stare DecisisWhy precedent matters and how courts rely on prior decisions.Read the Article ➔
Double JeopardyUnderstanding Fifth Amendment protections against multiple prosecutions.Read the Article ➔

🔎 Why Use the Case Brief Library?

✅ Full IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion)
✅ Historical context and modern significance
✅ Key companion cases highlighted
✅ Written for students, scholars, and legal professionals
✅ Always expanding and always free to access!

🛒 Premium Case Briefs and Study Aids

👉 Explore Premium Case Briefs ➔

✍️ Want a Custom Case Brief or Legal Summary Done for You?
Hire me directly for tailored briefs, fast turnaround, and academic-level detail.
🎯 Hire me on Fiverr

🔗 Stay Connected Across Platforms

Follow and support Law School Briefs everywhere I post:

⚖️ Build Your Legal Knowledge Today

At Case Brief Library, we help you master the cases that define American law — faster and smarter. 🚀

Clear. Concise. Powerful Legal Knowledge.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marbury v. Madison – Case Brief (IRAC Format)

⚖️ Case Brief: Marbury v. Madison (1803) Court: Supreme Court of the United States Date: February 24, 1803 Citation: 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) Chief Justice: John Marshall Decision: Unanimous (4–0) ❓ Issue 🧩 Whether or not the plaintiff, William Marbury, has a right to the writ of mandamus he has demanded and whether or not it be in the power of a court of law to issue such a writ? —Further, whether or no the act to Congress, passed on 24th of Feb., 1789, entitled "An act to establish the judicial courts of the United States," gives the Supreme Court of the United States "original jurisdiction" to issue such writ? 📘 Rule 📜 The Constitution is above all laws. Any law made by Congress—if it does not agree with the Constitution—will not apply. In such cases, the judiciary must see whether or not an act is constitutional and can stand. → Established Judicial Review. 📝 Facts ⏳ John Adams made many Midnight Judges in his last days under the Judiciary Act of 1801, a...
Read more

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief

  Terry v. Ohio Case Brief (1968) | IRAC Format Case Name: Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Issue 🔎 Does a police officer's stop and frisk of an individual without a warrant or probable cause violate the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures? Rule 📜 The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. However, a brief investigative stop ("stop and frisk") is allowed when a police officer has a reasonable suspicion , based on specific and articulable facts, that criminal activity is afoot and that the individual may be armed and dangerous. The frisk must be limited to a pat-down of outer clothing to check for weapons. Analysis 🧠 The Court reasoned that the Fourth Amendment’s protections are not absolute barriers to all police-citizen encounters. A balance must be struck between the individual’s right to personal security and the government's interest in crime prevention and officer safety. In Terry’s case...
Read more

Sweatt v. Painter – Case Brief (IRAC Format)

⚖️ Sweatt v. Painter , 339 U.S. 629 (1950) – IRAC Brief ❓ Issue Does the State of Texas, by denying Heman Marion Sweatt admission to the University of Texas Law School solely because he was Black, and instead offering him a separate law school for Black students, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? 📜 Rule The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides: “No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” — U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1 Under this rule, segregation in public education must provide substantially equal educational opportunities . If the separate facilities are not equal in quality, they violate the Constitution. 🔍 Analysis In 1946, Heman Marion Sweatt applied for admission to the University of Texas School of Law, the only public law school in the state at that time. Since it was a matter of course that the institution would return his application automatica...
Read more